Article
Construction Cashflow 101: Progress Claims, Retentions And Funding Gaps
Written and reviewed by James Chee, CPA · Last reviewed
A plain‑English guide to progress claims, retentions and cashflow gaps in Australian construction, plus funding options tradies and builders can act on this week.
Key Takeaway
Construction working capital finance helps Australian builders and tradies bridge cashflow gaps created by progress claims, retentions and delayed payments, which can easily run 30–90 days. By mapping weekly cash in and out on each project, then stress‑testing for 20–30% cost overruns and slow payers, owners can size an overdraft, invoice finance or project facility safely. The key actionable insight is to match funding terms and security to job duration and risk, rather than relying on personal home-loan redraw or offsets.
Watch the short answer
Subcontractors relying on progress payments
If you’re juggling slow progress pays on site, this video walks through practical cash flow options that build on what you’ve just read.
Read the transcript
If you are a subcontractor relying on progress payments from a head contractor who regularly stretches your terms out to 60 days, you are funding their business at the expense of your own. You shouldn't have to freeze your growth because someone else is slow to pay. We build flexible commercial invoice lines that release up to 85% of your values in 24 hours. DM me 'UNCLOG' to claim your cash flow back.
General information only, not personal advice. Your situation is assessed before any recommendation.
This topic is covered in full on Local Knowledge Finance
A plain‑English guide to progress claims, retentions and cashflow gaps in Australian construction, plus funding options tradies and builders can act on this week.
Read the full guide on ding.financialConstruction working capital finance helps builders and tradies cover wages, suppliers and subcontractors while waiting to be paid on progress claims and retentions, usually over 30–90 days. The aim is to fund that gap with purpose‑built business facilities, not your home loan redraw or personal offset, so trading risk doesn’t land on the family home.
If you’re running jobs now, your priority this week is simple: map your actual cash gap per project, then decide whether an overdraft, invoice finance or specialist progress‑claim facility is the best fit.
Mapping progress claims against costs shows the real funding gap on each job.
1. How construction working capital really behaves
1.1 The construction cashflow pattern
Compared with many industries, construction has three extra stress points:
- Front‑loaded costs – mobilisation, deposits to suppliers, insurances and site establishment before the first claim.
- Progress claims – typically monthly, often certified by a superintendent or client before payment.
- Retentions – 2–10% of each claim withheld until practical completion, then end of defect period.
That means you can be profitable on paper but cash‑poor in reality. As outlined in /insights/industry-specific-working-capital-patterns-risks, project‑based businesses like builders must size working capital around the worst month, not the average year.
1.2 Typical timing in Australia
While every contract differs, a common pattern is:
- Payment terms: 30 days from claim approval, but 45–60 days in practice.
- Retentions: 5% total (2.5% until practical completion, 2.5% until end of defects liability period, say 12 months).
- Variations: often disputed or delayed.
Layer in the APRA 3% home‑loan serviceability buffer and rising input costs (the ABS Producer Price Index for construction is still running above general inflation), and personal and business resilience become tightly linked.
2. Progress claims, retentions and the real cash gap
2.1 Worked example: a $1.2m contract
Assume a builder wins a $1.2m (ex‑GST) project, expected to run 9 months, with:
- 5% retention (2.5% at practical completion, 2.5% at 12 months)
- Monthly claims based on work done
- 30‑day terms, but paid on average 45 days after claim
Rough cash profile (simplified):
| Month | Cumulative costs paid (A$) | Cumulative claims approved (A$) | Retentions held (A$) | Cash position vs costs* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120,000 | 100,000 | 5,000 | -25,000 |
| 3 | 400,000 | 350,000 | 17,500 | -67,500 |
| 6 | 800,000 | 750,000 | 37,500 | -87,500 |
| 9 | 1,150,000 | 1,140,000 | 57,000 | +47,000 |
| 21** | 1,200,000 | 1,200,000 | 0 | +0 |
*Assumes claims are eventually paid in full; ignores overheads. **End of 12‑month defects period.
Even with no blowouts, this builder needs capacity to fund at least $90k–$100k of gap on this one job, plus overheads and any other projects. If material prices jump 15% mid‑project, that gap can widen fast.
The strategy continues below
You've seen the problem and the groundwork — now unlock the exact steps our CPA and Registered Tax Agent-led brokers use, including 4 more sections. Enter your email for instant, free full access.
Free access. No spam — unsubscribe anytime. Your details stay confidential.
Frequently asked questions
Talk to a broker who is a CPA and Registered Tax Agent
Free consultation, plain-English advice tailored to your situation.
