Article
How Directors Can Structure Wages, Dividends and Super For Maximum Borrowing
A practical guide for Australian company directors on how wages, dividends and super contributions affect home loan borrowing power, and what to tweak over the next 12–24 months.
Key Takeaway
For Australian company directors, the best way to maximise home loan borrowing power is usually a higher, stable taxable wage supported by consistent dividend history, rather than lumpy drawings or one‑off payouts. Lenders typically add back retained company profit and some super contributions when assessing income, but only where they are recurring and documented. Aligning tax planning and loan strategy 12–24 months ahead lets directors trade a small tax increase for materially higher borrowing capacity.
This topic is covered in full on Tailored Loans Sydney
A practical guide for Australian company directors on how wages, dividends and super contributions affect home loan borrowing power, and what to tweak over the next 12–24 months.
Read the full guide on tailoredloans.sydneyIf you’re a company director, structuring your wages, dividends and super correctly can significantly increase home loan borrowing power, often more than chasing a slightly lower interest rate. Lenders favour a higher, stable salary plus consistent dividends and clear company profits over lumpy drawings or once‑off payouts.
In practice, that means deliberately tuning your mix of PAYG wages, dividends and super 12–24 months before you apply. You’re trading a bit more tax and discipline for a much stronger full‑doc application and better product choice.
For directors, how you label income streams changes how banks see your borrowing power.
1. How banks look at director income (in plain English)
Most lenders don’t care what you call your pay — they care whether it looks like stable, taxable income backed by business performance.
For company directors, banks usually look at three layers:
- Your personal PAYG wage (director’s salary).
- Dividends and trust distributions.
- The underlying company profit that’s available to you.
They generally want two years of financials, and will usually use the lower year or an average, with APRA’s 3%+ serviceability buffer applied to repayments.
Key income types and how they’re treated
| Income type | How lenders often treat it (indicative) | Risk from bank’s view |
|---|---|---|
| Director wage (PAYG) | Taken at 100% if stable and ongoing | Low – looks like a normal salary |
| Regular dividends | Counted if consistent over 2 years | Medium – must show business can sustain them |
| Once‑off large dividend | Often ignored or shaded heavily | High – not seen as recurring |
| Retained company profit | Some lenders add a portion back if you’re majority owner | Medium – depends on business strength |
| Employer SG super (11%+) | Usually ignored for borrowing power | Low – but helps long‑term wealth |
| Extra salary‑sacrifice super | Reduces assessable income; rarely added back | Medium – can hurt borrowing capacity |
(Policies vary by lender; this is indicative only.)
For a deeper overview of how structure and stability affect your numbers, see /insights/structure-business-salary-banks-lend-more.
2. Director wages vs dividends: what actually boosts capacity?
Why a higher, stable wage usually wins
Most banks start with your taxable salary. A higher, regular wage:
- Is easy to verify via payslips, PAYG summaries and your tax return.
- Signals that the business can comfortably support that level of pay.
- Is often used at 100% in servicing calculators.
If your current wage is artificially low for tax reasons, your borrowing capacity is almost certainly lower than it needs to be.
Where dividends fit in
Dividends can be powerful supporting income when they are:
- Paid at similar levels across 2+ years; and
- Clearly linked to sustainable profits, not one‑off events.
Lenders may average two years of dividends. A single spike (e.g. cleaning out retained earnings) is often excluded.
For a more detailed look at labels (wages, dividends, drawings), read /insights/director-loans-dividends-drawings-structuring-pay-home-loan.
Worked example: small change, big borrowing difference
Assume you currently:
- Pay yourself $80,000 salary.
- Take $40,000 dividends (lumpy).
Your broker might model instead:
- $120,000 salary, and
- $20,000 regular dividends.
Total pre‑tax income is the same ($160,000), but many lender calculators will show materially higher borrowing power under the second structure because:
- There’s more stable PAYG income.
- Dividends look recurring and modest.
You will likely pay more tax each year, but may gain hundreds of thousands in extra borrowing capacity and access to sharper full‑doc rates.
The strategy continues below
You've seen the problem and the groundwork — now unlock the exact steps our CPA-certified brokers use, including 4 more sections. Enter your email for instant, free full access.
Free access. No spam — unsubscribe anytime. Your details stay confidential.
Frequently asked questions
Talk to a CPA-certified broker
Free consultation, plain-English advice tailored to your situation.
