Skip to main content
Loading the latest on mortgages, RBA & inflation…
Local Knowledge Finance

Article

Should You Move an Existing Property Into a Trust or Company Now?

Thinking about shifting an existing property into a trust, company or SMSF after recent tax changes? This guide explains the real traps, stamp duty, CGT and lending costs so you can decide if restructuring stacks up this year.

Published 17 Aug 2026Updated 27 Aug 2026Reviewed 21 Aug 20268 min read

Key Takeaway

Moving an existing Australian property into a trust, company or SMSF generally triggers stamp duty at market value and may crystallise capital gains tax, even after the 2026–27 CGT and negative gearing reforms. These restructures also affect borrowing capacity, interest rates and land tax, often costing tens of thousands of dollars. Investors should model all entry (stamp duty), holding (land tax, cashflow) and exit (CGT) costs across 10–20 years before acting, and often gain more by changing structure only for future purchases.

Should You Move an Existing Property Into a Trust or Company Now?

This topic is covered in full on Tailored Loans Sydney

Thinking about shifting an existing property into a trust, company or SMSF after recent tax changes? This guide explains the real traps, stamp duty, CGT and lending costs so you can decide if restructuring stacks up this year.

Read the full guide on tailoredloans.sydney

Moving an existing property into a trust or company after the recent tax changes usually triggers stamp duty at market value, often crystallises capital gains tax (CGT), and can reduce borrowing power. For most Australians, the cost of shifting title now outweighs the tax benefits, so the safer move is often to leave ownership as is and optimise future purchases instead.

In this guide we’ll step through the main traps and costs so you can decide, this week, whether to restructure or stay put.

Diagram showing property transfer from individual to trust and company with tax labels Transferring a property into a trust or company usually triggers stamp duty and CGT.

1. Why people want to move properties now – and the core reality

The 2026–27 reforms remove the simple 50% CGT discount from 1 July 2027 and tighten negative gearing on many established residential properties. That has more investors asking: “Should I move my existing properties into a trust or company now?”

In most cases, the answer is no. The law usually treats a transfer into a trust, company or SMSF as a sale at market value. That means:

  1. Stamp duty based on today’s value (state law).
  2. CGT on the unrealised gain to date (federal law).
  3. Potential land tax and lending side‑effects.

If you’re still picking structures for new deals, read /insights/personal-trust-company-best-structure-geared-property-2026 first, then come back to this article for existing properties.

2. The big three tax costs: duty, CGT and land tax

2.1 Stamp duty on transfers to a new structure

State revenue offices usually treat moving a property into a trust or company as a dutiable transaction at market value, even if you own both.

Illustrative example (NSW, investment unit)

  • Market value: $1,000,000
  • Original cost: $600,000
  • Current owner: individual
  • Proposed owner: family trust

Estimate the transfer duty:

  • Duty on $1,000,000 in NSW is roughly $40,000+ (check current scale).
  • Legal and registration costs might add $2,000–$3,000.

You are paying duty again as if you were buying your own property back.

2.2 CGT on deemed disposal

For CGT, moving the property is generally treated as if you sold it at market value and bought it back in the new entity.

Using the same example:

  • Cost base: $600,000
  • Market value: $1,000,000
  • Gross capital gain: $400,000

Under the reforms, most individuals face at least 30% tax on real gains after 1 July 2027. Depending on timing and transitional rules, you could easily see a six‑figure tax bill just to move the title.

Remember: from 1 July 2027 the existing 50% CGT discount is abolished and a minimum 30% tax on capital gains applies to most Australian residents. Handling that by choice now rarely makes sense unless there is a very strong asset protection or estate planning reason.

2.3 Land tax changes after moving into a trust or company

Land tax sits on top of federal rules. Shifting a property into a trust or company can:

  • Lose a land tax threshold.
  • Push you into a higher land tax rate.
  • Trigger trust surcharge rates if the trust deed isn’t fixed or disclosure rules aren’t met.

For a clear framework on modelling entry, holding and exit taxes together, see /insights/federal-property-tax-rules-land-tax-stamp-duty-interactions.

2.4 Quick comparison: leave it vs move it

ScenarioLeave property in your nameMove property into family trust/company
Upfront cost now$0 duty, $0 CGT (no transfer)Stamp duty on market value + CGT on gain
Land tax profileIndividual/PPOR rulesTrust/company rules, thresholds may change
Future CGT (post‑2027 rules)New CGT settings apply on saleNew CGT settings apply on sale in entity
Asset protection / successionPersonal risk, simple estateBetter ring‑fencing, more complex control
Lending / refinancingSimpler, stronger borrowing powerTighter serviceability, possible higher rates

For many households, the left column wins on pure numbers.

Frequently asked questions

In most cases, no. State revenue offices treat a transfer into a trust or company as a dutiable transaction at current market value, even if you own both. Some narrow exemptions or concessions exist for restructures or deceased estates, but they are highly technical and require specific eligibility. Assume full duty applies unless a specialist confirms otherwise in writing.
Usually not enough to justify the upfront cost. The 2026–27 reforms treat most individuals and discretionary trusts similarly, with the 50% CGT discount removed and a minimum 30% tax on real gains. Moving now normally crystallises CGT and stamp duty without delivering a significantly better rate later, so you need proper 10–20 year modelling to see any real benefit.
For standard bank lending, the borrower and registered owner generally need to align, so a simple name change on the loan is not enough. Lenders will usually require a full refinance plus a title update, treating it like a new purchase by the company. Trying to mismatch title and borrower adds legal and tax risks and is rarely sustainable.
No. In Australia, interest deductibility depends on what the borrowed money is used for, not whose name appears on the title. If the loan funds your main residence, the interest is generally not deductible, even if a trust or company holds the title. Moving a home into an entity can also complicate land tax and lending without any deduction benefit.

Talk to a CPA-certified broker

Free consultation, plain-English advice tailored to your situation.

Your details are kept confidential. We'll never share them.