Can I still buy another investment property in my late 50s?

You can, but the bar should be much higher. Any new purchase should leave your overall LVR and cash buffers within conservative guardrails and still allow a clear de-gearing path before your planned retirement age. For many, it’s safer to strengthen the balance sheet—paying down debt and building liquid assets—rather than adding more leverage so late in the cycle.

Article

Smart Gearing Moves When You’re Property‑Heavy and Nearing Retirement

Q: Should I sell an investment property to pay off my home before retirement?

Selling an underperforming or highly geared investment to clear non-deductible home debt is often sensible in your 50s and 60s, especially if cashflow is tight. The decision should weigh asset quality, CGT, selling costs and how much it improves your retirement cashflow and stress levels. A clear keep/sell ranking of each property helps avoid emotional decisions.

Q: How much debt is safe to carry into retirement?

There’s no single safe number, but many retirees aim for no home debt and an overall investment LVR around 50–60% or less. What matters is that repayments and holding costs are easily covered by reliable income, with buffers for rate rises and vacancies. If you’re relying on growth or tax breaks to stay afloat, you’re likely over-geared.

Q: Is negative gearing still worth it after the 2027 reforms?

Negative gearing will largely be quarantined to new builds, and many established properties bought after May 2026 won’t be able to offset rental losses against salary. That means new decisions should assume little or no negative gearing benefit. The focus shifts to asset quality, pre-tax returns, and sustainable gearing levels rather than tax-driven losses.

Q: What cash buffer should a geared pre-retiree hold?

A practical minimum is 3–6 months of all home and investment loan repayments plus property expenses in cash or offset. Many pre-retirees feel more comfortable with 6–12 months covered, especially if they are self-employed or work in volatile industries. Buffers let you ride out vacancies, rate spikes or health issues without forced sales.

A practical, numbers‑driven guide for Australians in their 50s and early 60s who are rich in property but short on cash, and need to decide whether to hold, de‑gear or sell before retirement.

Published 7 Aug 2026Updated 27 Aug 2026Reviewed 21 Aug 20268 min read

Key Takeaway

Australians in their 50s and early 60s who are property-rich but cash-poor should usually begin a deliberate de-gearing plan 5–10 years before retirement, focusing on cashflow resilience, buffers, and pre-tax asset quality rather than tax perks. A practical stress test is modelling a 3% interest rate rise and three months’ vacancy and checking that cash or offset can cover 6–12 months of holding costs. The key actionable step is to map all loans, buffers, and retirement income needs, then choose a specific sell-or-pay-down priority for the next 12–24 months.

Smart Gearing Moves When You’re Property‑Heavy and Nearing Retirement

This topic is covered in full on Tailored Loans Sydney

A practical, numbers‑driven guide for Australians in their 50s and early 60s who are rich in property but short on cash, and need to decide whether to hold, de‑gear or sell before retirement.

Read the full guide on tailoredloans.sydney

Many Australians in their 50s and early 60s are property‑heavy but cash‑light: solid portfolio on paper, tight cashflow, and retirement only 5–10 years away. In that position, you generally need to start deliberately reducing risk and gearing, not hoping growth will bail you out. The core decision is which debts to cut first, which properties to keep, and whether you can safely hold until (and through) retirement.

In practical terms, that means: 1) stress‑testing your portfolio under higher rates and lower tax perks, 2) prioritising de‑gearing over new leverage, and 3) mapping a 5–10 year exit plan aligned with downsizing and super.

De-gearing plan notes for a property-heavy pre-retiree Start by mapping your loans, properties and buffers on one page.

1. How to tell if you’re “property‑heavy, cash‑light”

1.1 Quick diagnostic you can run this week

You’re likely in the danger zone if:

Investment LVR is above ~70–75% and you’re within 10 years of your ‘work‑optional’ age.
Your portfolio turns cashflow negative if rates rise 2–3% or rents dip.
You have less than 3–6 months of full holding costs in cash/offset.

A practical stress test is to model at least a 3% rate rise plus three months’ vacancy per property, and check if your buffers can carry you 6–12 months (knowledge fact, also in /insights/stress-testing-geared-property-portfolio-rate-rises-vacancies).

If those numbers scare you, you’re too highly geared for your stage of life.

1.2 Why pre‑retirees need a different gearing mindset

In your 30s–40s, time and income growth can cover mistakes. In your 50s–60s:

Job changes, illness, or caring responsibilities can hit income suddenly.
The RBA’s recent moves show how fast rates can jump.
The 2026–27 negative gearing and CGT reforms mean you should not rely on tax perks to make a marginal property work (see /insights/updated-cgt-rules-geared-property-investors-2027-playbook).

Most investors should treat the 10 years before retirement as a deliberate de‑gearing window rather than a last sprint for more leverage (reinforcing /insights/keep-or-reduce-gearing-50s-60s-decision-framework).

2. Your three main options: hold, de‑gear, or sell

2.1 Side‑by‑side comparison

Strategy	When it fits best	Main benefits	Key risks / trade‑offs
Hold current gearing	Strong surplus cashflow, big buffers, >10 yrs to retire	Maximal upside if growth continues	Exposed to rate rises, tax changes, income shocks
De‑gear but keep properties	Good assets, but cashflow tight or retirement <10 yrs away	Lowers stress, improves retirement income	Slower wealth build, may need lifestyle belt‑tightening
Sell one or more properties	High LVR, poor asset(s), very tight cashflow or nearing 60+	Releases cash, cuts risk, funds super/home	CGT, selling costs, emotional difficulty

This isn’t all‑or‑nothing. Many pre‑retirees end up selling one weaker asset, paying down debt on the rest, and then holding a leaner, safer portfolio.

For a deeper framework on overall gearing level decisions, cross‑check with /insights/keep-or-reduce-gearing-50s-60s-decision-framework.

3. A worked example: what a de‑gearing move can look like

Say you’re 57, planning to work to 67. - Home value: $1.6m, home loan $600k (LVR 37.5%). - Investment unit: $900k, loan $720k (LVR 80%). - Current rate: 6% interest‑only on investment, 5.8% P&I on home. - Rent: $800 per week ($41,600 p.a.). - Holding costs (interest, strata, rates, maintenance, insurance, agent): ~$70,000 p.a. ### 3.1 Today’s cashflow Investment property net position: - Rent: $41,600 - Costs (including interest): $70,000 - Net loss: −$28,400 pre‑tax. At present, some or all of that loss may be deductible, but after the **2026–27…

Premium insight

The strategy continues below

You've seen the problem and the groundwork — now unlock the exact steps our CPA-certified brokers use, including 4 more sections. Enter your email for instant, free full access.

Free access. No spam — unsubscribe anytime. Your details stay confidential.

Frequently asked questions

Selling an underperforming or highly geared investment to clear non-deductible home debt is often sensible in your 50s and 60s, especially if cashflow is tight. The decision should weigh asset quality, CGT, selling costs and how much it improves your retirement cashflow and stress levels. A clear keep/sell ranking of each property helps avoid emotional decisions.

There’s no single safe number, but many retirees aim for no home debt and an overall investment LVR around 50–60% or less. What matters is that repayments and holding costs are easily covered by reliable income, with buffers for rate rises and vacancies. If you’re relying on growth or tax breaks to stay afloat, you’re likely over-geared.

Negative gearing will largely be quarantined to new builds, and many established properties bought after May 2026 won’t be able to offset rental losses against salary. That means new decisions should assume little or no negative gearing benefit. The focus shifts to asset quality, pre-tax returns, and sustainable gearing levels rather than tax-driven losses.

A practical minimum is 3–6 months of all home and investment loan repayments plus property expenses in cash or offset. Many pre-retirees feel more comfortable with 6–12 months covered, especially if they are self-employed or work in volatile industries. Buffers let you ride out vacancies, rate spikes or health issues without forced sales.

Talk to a CPA-certified broker

Free consultation, plain-English advice tailored to your situation.

All insights